Tag: UFO Cover-up

  • Journalist Ross Coulthart’s “Estimate of the Situation”

    Journalist Ross Coulthart’s “Estimate of the Situation”

    Some refer to the long standing UFO cover-up as America’s “Cosmic Watergate”. In his keynote address at this summer’s 2025 Contact in the Desert conference, Australian journalist Ross Coulthart of News Nation castigates U.S. military leaders, members of Congress, and mainstream media “journalists” for their abject failure to meaningfully address to UFO cover-up. Mr. Coulthart’s message, however, also inspires hope for those of us who are no longer tolerant of being gaslighted by our government about the reality of UFOs and the non-human intelligence behind them. We know this is real, and we are winning the battle for UFO truth and transparency!

  • It’s Called Counterintelligence for a Reason (and it’s directed at you!).

    It’s Called Counterintelligence for a Reason (and it’s directed at you!).

    Definitions: AARO – the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office; DoD – Department of Defense; IC – Intelligence Community (eighteen separate US intelligence services); NHI – Non-human Intelligence (e.g. ETs/aliens); USG – United States Government; UAP – Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena; sUAS – standard Unmanned Aerial System (implied meaning = man-made drone)

    The AARO’s March 6, 2024 Congressionally mandated historical report on “UAP”, displayed below, continues the practice of a faction of our USG/DoD filtering disinformation about UFOs into the brains of American citizens. The report is less than worthless. Its overarching message, prominently displayed in bold type in the Executive Summary and repeated several times throughout the report falsely states, “AARO found no evidence that any USG investigation, academic-sponsored research, or official review panel has confirmed that any sighting of a UAP represented extraterrestrial technology.” This is, literally, a boldface lie. The leadership of the AARO has heard plenty of testimony from people who know we are dealing with a technologically advanced non-human intelligence (NHI) that is engaging with our reality.

    To read an extremely comprehensive and thoroughly damning critique of the AARO’s “Historical Report”, go to this article written by Christopher Mellon that was published in The Debrief on April 12, 2024.

    In this interview, News Nation journalist Ross Coulthart kicks off his new program titled Reality Check with an interview of public interest attorney Daniel Sheehan. During this interview Mr. Sheehan states that he personally gave testimony, under oath, to Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick at the AARO detailing his firsthand experience in viewing a 1940s-era photo of a UFO crash retrieval involving US military personnel that he discovered while perusing the classified portion of Project Blue Book files. To watch the full interview, go HERE.

    What does USN Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet have to say about the AARO report?

    As a rebuttal to the AARO’s claim that “there’s nothing of interest to see here”, the video below features the latest statements we have heard from US Navy Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet (Ret.), previous Director of NOAA and now a member of The SOL Foundation‘s and Americans for Safe Aerospace‘s Advisory Boards. He has already spoken to the AARO and he told them what you hear in this video. (For brevity’s sake, these clips are taken from podcast The Big Thing hosted by Kristian Harloff. These clips omit any mention of Darcy Weirs’ documentary film Transmedium: Fastmovers and USOs which is available on Amazon Prime and several other media outlets. Please check it out!)

    Echoing the claims of US intel officer David Grusch, Rear Admiral Gallaudet once again confirms the following:

    • Our civilization is experiencing contact with one or more higher, non-human intelligence(s) that we may discover are hiding in Earth’s oceans.
    • The USG has an active UFO crash retrieval program(s).
    • “Legacy programs” to reverse engineer captured UFOs do exist.
    • “The Schumer Amendment” is key to our elected representatives in Congress gaining full and unfettered access to known but classified information concerning captured and recovered UFOs stemming from this non-human intelligence (NHI).
    • Rear Admiral Gallaudet is willing to testify about this under oath before Congress.

    We can applaud Rear Admiral Gallaudet’s candid statements as being UFO truth except for one when he states, “Frankly, the government still doesn’t know what they are.” Although the DoD/IC may not yet understand the physics behind how UFOs function, it is by now clearly known that UFOs are a means of physical transport used by the NHI controlling them to “get around”. This has been known since The Roswell UFO Incident of July of 1947 when a NHI craft was recovered by the US military – and has been lied about by the DoD ever since. Fortunately, and like Tim Gallaudet today, we had two honest and courageous individuals who told us the truth about the Roswell craft decades ago – Major Jesse A. Marcel, Sr. and his son, Dr. Jesse A. Marcel, Jr. Both of these men held in their hands and closely inspected the Roswell UFO crash debris which Marcel Sr. declared in 1978 was “not of this Earth.” Both of these men served their country with honor, and both were honest and courageous individuals. By now they have been thrown under the bus by their contemporaries currently occupying positions of “leadership” within the Pentagon so many times that the AARO’s newest report adds little to the damage already done to the reputations of these two men and the honorable service they gave to our country.

    What have we previously heard from Dr. James Lacatski?

    Dr. James T. Lacatski is an engineer who served from 2009 through 2012 as a Program Manager for the Advanced Aerospace Weapons Systems Applications Program (AAWSAP) under the Defense Intelligence Agency. On page 86 of the book Inside the U.S. Government Covert UFO Program: Initial Revelations, co-author James Lacatski writes, “He (Lacatski) stated that the United States is in possession of a craft of unknown origin and had successfully gained access to its interior.” Below, we hear Lacatski being asked about this during an interview with Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp on their podcast Weaponized.

    Ross Coulthart’s conversation with Nat Kobitz.

    In 2021, Australian journalist Ross Coulthart published the first edition of his book In Plain Sight. In that book and once again in this video interview, Coulthart tells of a telephone conversation he had with a dying man named Nat Kobitz. Mr. Kobitz had served as Director of Advanced Technology Development & Assessment, Director of Research & Development, and, Program Manager for Advanced Ships/Foreign Shipbuilding for the US Navy. During the phone call, Coulthart asked Kobitz if he “had ever been read into” any USG program tasked with reverse engineering a captured and recovered UFO of non-human origin. After a long pause, Kobitz replied, “Yes”. In follow up, Coulthart asked Kobitz how many non-human UFOs had been recovered and Kobitz replied, “Multiple.” Because Kobitz knew he was dying, he expressed to Coulthart his lack of concern for what might happen to him for revealing this classified information. This is a video of Coulthart relating this story:

    US Navy F-18 Pilot Ryan Graves

    US Navy F-18 fighter pilot Ryan Graves explains that non-hostile UFOs were seen off the coast of Virginia Beach and inside the boundaries of their restricted training area by multiple Navy pilots every day. This USN training area is ten miles off the Virginia coast, making it highly unlikely these are the standard “drones” we are familiar with. The objects are described as 5-15 feet in diameter with the shape of some being a dark cube within a clear sphere. The UFOs displayed velocities from zero to 0.8 Mach (e.g. not balloons) with loiter times of 13 hours (about 6 times the continuous operation period for an F-18). Graves rightfully acknowledges these incidents create a serious “domain awareness” issue resulting in a now-known flight hazard for both military and commercial pilots. This issue, and to help remove the “UFO stigma”, is why Graves has created the organization Americans for Safe Aerospace.

    Two additional video critiques of the AARO Historical Report are now found on YouTube, one by UFO historian Richard Dolan and another by SUNY Albany professor of physics Dr. Kevin Knuth. Both are worthy of your time, and both make it clear that, among those who truly study UFOs, the AARO report is a mockery of UFO history on a level we might expect from a junior high school student, certainly not a PhD scientist like “Dr.” Sean Kirkpatrick.

    So, about the recent Joint Chief’s GENADMIN document…

    A recent FOIA request submitted by investigative journalist Douglas Dean Johnson has resulted in his securing the following document. It is recommended that you download and parse the wording of this document carefully.

    Focusing on selected portions of this document leads to some interesting and even alarming insights:

    • 3.A.1.The document details the reporting requirements for “all UAP incidents, incursions, and engagements”. This implies the US military is confronting UFOs and their operators using military aggression.
    • 3.A.5. “AARO coordinates across the US Government to identify the appropriate agency to assist in the shipping, transferring, receiving, storing, examining, etc., of material and data associated with the UAP incident.” Would AARO be assigned these duties if the “drones”, “UAPs”, “UASs” being encountered and engaged with are the common, off-the-shelf drones are widely available? How does the military “engage” with an off-the-shelf “drone”?
    • 3.B.1.A. SPACEBORNE UAP are sources of anomalous detections above the Karman line. Vehicles depending on aerodynamic lift cannot perform above the Karman line (>100 km above sea level). Therefore, a “Spaceborne UAP” could not be a conventional “drone” yet, apparently, “spaceborne UAP” are being detected.
    • 3.B.5. A UAP INTEROGATION is the elicitation of UAP location, capabilities, characteristics, and/or intent using passive and/or active sensing capabilities – including but not limited to electro-optical imagery, infrared/thermal, radiofrequency/radar, light/laser/lidar/ladar (for precision velocity and direction tracking), electromagnetic, gravitational, and radioactive means. This paragraph gives us a strong indicator that the “drones” invading these sensitive areas are not standard, off-the shelf equipment. “Drones” do not produce detectable gravitational waves, nor would the largest commercial jet. This leaves little doubt that the US is confronting anti-gravity vehicles (UFOs) that could produce a detectable gravitational disturbance and/or simply demonstrate a directly observable anti-gravity capability (hovering silently) due to an absence of motion and any aerodynamic features/airfoils. This fits the description of a classic NHI UFO.
    • 3.B.8. A UAP THREAT is a force-protection or national security risk to persons, materiel, or information by UAP that demonstrate hostile intent.
    • The document makes a clear distinction between “sUAS” (standard Unmanned Aerial Systems = man-made drones) and anomalous “UAP” (UFOs) and expresses little interest in sUASs.
    • “The potentially ubiquitous presence of UAP defines the national security implications of those anomalies which range from operational hazards and threats to technological and intelligence surprise to adversaries’ miscalculations.” This word, “miscalculations”, likely alludes to the possibility of a resulting nuclear war due to misidentification of UFOs that could be mistaken for a launch of nuclear missiles. Presently, the President has 15 minutes to consider all factors and make a decision. The nuclear doctrine of “mutually assured destruction” (MAD) is defunct in the face of thousands of UFO intrusions over sensitive US airspace and installations.
    • 3.C.1. “Details of UAP-related health incidents (e.g. physiological, psychological effects and whether persistent or transitory)… What physiological or psychological effects would a standard “drone” cause or elicit? This makes no sense if the DoD is dealing with conventional “drones”.
    • P. 5, Line 5.A. UAP ANOMALOUS CHARACTERISTICS/BEHAVIORS (e.g. no apparent control surfaces, extreme acceleration/direction change, detection by certain sensors but not others.) These characteristics of “flying discs” were listed in “The Twining Memo” of 1947! They are still here, and they are now confronting our military, according to General Guillot, by the thousands.
    • This document features phrases like “mitigation”, “destroy”, and “material exploitation”, a strong indication that the US military is taking a belligerent posture toward these “drones”.

    Who else has told us “We are not alone”?

    Among Presidents, Barak Obama came closest to telling us the truth about UFOs in 2021 when he stated,” “What is true, and I’m actually being serious here, is that there are, there’s footage and records of objects in the skies, that we don’t know exactly what they are. We can’t explain how they moved, their trajectory. They did not have an easily explainable pattern. And so, you know, I think that people still take seriously trying to investigate and figure out what that is.”

    The list of other credible individuals who have either told us or strongly hinted that “we are not alone” is long and still growing. Some of the better known include Major Jesse Marcel, Sr., Dr. Jesse Marcel, Jr., Apollo astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Mercury astronaut Gordon Cooper, British Admiral Lord Hill Norton, AZ Governor Fife Symington, Col. Phillip Corso, Sgt. Dan Sherman (Above Black – communicated with 2 different alien beings), Luis Elizondo, Capt. Robert Salas, Capt. David Schindele, USAF Staff Sgt. Mario Woods, USN fighter pilot David Fravor, Stanford Professor Dr. Garry Nolan, US intel officer David Grusch, 1st Lt. Walter Haut, CIA Intel Officer Jim Semivan, Sgt. James Penniston, Sgt. John Burroughs, Capt. Charles Halt, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliff, USN pilot Alex Dietrich, Betty and Barney Hill, Capt. Wendell Stevens, Maurice Chatelain of NASA, Paul Hill of NASA, and many more.

    Is the USG in an undeclared “war” with aliens, unbeknownst to Congress and the American people?

    Throughout December 2023, we are told “mystery drones” swarmed the highly restricted airspace over Langley-Eustis AFB for weeks. The “drones” varied in size and configuration, and none were perceived to act in a hostile manner. Langley-Eustis AFB is the USAF base primarily responsible for protecting the White House, the Pentagon, and the US Capitol. Note: the distance between Langley -Eustis AFB and US Naval Air Station Oceana where UFOs were being encountered every day by US Navy pilots is 41 miles!

    Another incident, this time over the ocean.

    And three others out over the ocean. If these are “drones” as we are led to believe, how do they get way out over the ocean and where are they launched from?:

    More than a year ago, Senator Marco Rubio posted this tweet on X/Twitter”:

    Update 4/21/2024: An article from The Hill has been published today that also questions whether “drones” is the appropriate descriptor for the objects (UFOs) being repeatedly witnessed near sensitive U.S. military installations and assets, including nuclear weapons sites. You can find that HERE.

    The Pentagon’s wordsmithery

    We have experienced a confusing change in the words and acronyms the DoD/IC uses to refer to unidentified airborne objects or phenomena. In the minds of most people today, “UFO” still means a non-human (alien) spacecraft. The gatekeepers of the UFO cover-up rightfully understand that the term “UFO” represents a historical trap from which there will be no escape. To avoid that trap, they moved away from the term “UFO” to “UAP”. The term “UAP” leaves them more wiggle room because, when labeled as a “UAP”, a detected airborne object can encompass a broad range of possible explanations. We have been re-trained to accept the idea that resolving the identity of a “UAP” down to one final explanation, especially one invoking a NHI, is a daunting if not impossible task. The AARO report acknowledges that UAP are real, but falsely states that none are extraterrestrial UFOs stemming from a NHI.

    Having successfully completed the re-training of the news media and the public to use the acronym UAP rather than UFO, now and for the past year or so, we are now encountering the insidious introduction of the words “drones” and, even more recently “UAS” (Unmanned Aerial Systems) in lieu of using either of the terms UAP or UFO. In the public’s mind we all know what a drone is. A drone is some variation of a man-made quadcopter or else an unmanned, fly-by-wire military aircraft used for aerial surveillance or enemy attack, right? Using the words “drone” or “UAS” leads us to believe that the aerial object is man-made and effectively masks the possibility that the object(s) of interest might be a craft of non-human origin.

    Listen to this March 14 open Congressional hearing with USAF General Guillot when he says the number of these aerial incursions by “drones” or “UAS” over Langley-Eustis AFB has “outstripped the organizational framework that we have to address it.” Are these simply drones, or are they something else entirely – like UFOs?

    By now it is apparent that the NHI behind UFOs that is here seems to be creating mounting pressure on the US military. It is possible this may be an effort by the NHI to force UFO Disclosure. Rather than engage in war with the US military, perhaps the NHI prefers to let Earth’s people decide on what direction our human family’s relationship with their race(s) should take? By engaging in these increasingly confrontational encounters with our US military, the NHI is cultivating conditions under which the DoD will, at some point, have to admit that it is bumping up against a superior technology it is not equipped to deal with. We are left wondering whether any of these Senators or even General Guillot himself have been fully informed about the NHI presence and the strong possibility that many of the thousands of referenced “drone” or “UAS” incursions are technologically advanced UFOs stemming from the NHI? If not, that problem can be quickly rectified if the 40+ UFO whistleblowers will courageously step forward and deliver their firsthand testimony, under oath, in open hearings before a select committee of Congress.

    What do you think “dealing with little green men” means?

    In this speech before the Norwich College ROTC graduates in 2016, General Milley warned the new graduates that they would be “dealing with little green men“.

    Certainly, our US military cannot simply ignore what may be thousands of sensitive airspace violations by the NHI. Doing so would create an obvious vulnerability to other US adversaries, leaving them an opportunity to take advantage of any DoD failure to react to the NHI behind many of these “drone” intrusions. Something is going to have to give.

    AARO’s claim that “there’s nothing to see here” may be placing all of us in real and present danger.

    General Guillot makes it clear the US military is carefully assessing these repeated “drone” intrusions into the airspace over militarily restricted land and sea areas and is formulating strategies to respond to them. General Guillot mentions the potential use of “non-kinetic” weapons to bring them down. A non-kinetic weapon implies the use of a laser or maser weapon platform which the US military has already developed. If any of these “drones” do belong to the NHI, then the successful use of such weapons to destroy their assets may precipitate an escalation in hostile confrontations between them and the US DoD. What that might mean for the rest of mankind is anybody’s guess. That their strong hints about the dangers of our nuclear weapons have gone completely unheeded may add additional fuel to that fire.

    The U.S. government must end the UFO cover-up!

    From the information provided above it becomes evident that the DoD/IC is reaching the bitter end of its ability to maintain the decades-long UFO cover-up. It is becoming increasingly obvious to citizens and to members of Congress that, for many decades, we have all been lied to about the real existence of the NHI behind the UFOs. New Paradigm Institute, founded by attorney Daniel Sheehan, is intent on exposing the false narratives, like the AARO’s latest report, that continues to be promulgated by the likes of Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick and the dwindling number of USG personnel who still support the UFO cover-up.

    Nonetheless, based on the AARO report, it is clear that the DoD/IC are continuing to dig their hole of untruths deeper while they attempt to buy more time to reverse engineer recovered UFO craft and technologies that do not belong to them. It is not wild speculation to imagine that the mindset behind these efforts remains focused on furthering US “full-spectrum dominance” of the world, both militarily and economically. Meanwhile, we have two existential threats looming in our immediate present. It is possible, and I believe probable, that both can be solved or significantly mitigated in short order if recovered UFO technologies would be released to the world:

    • Global climate change. A single, 40 foot diameter UFO energy system has been conservatively estimated to produce >10 GW of power. See this PAPER.
    • The ever-growing threat of thermonuclear weapons. UFOs have been tracked by radar at 45,000 MPH or 750 MPM. At that velocity, a nuclear weapon could be delivered from the US to Russia in 7 minutes, and perhaps less. Such a capability would render nuclear weapons obsolete. The UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons would have to be signed by all nuclear-armed nations.

    To continue to delay UFO Disclosure is not only a crime against humanity and this planet we depend on for our survival. It is a corruption of the U.S. separation of powers as specified in the US Constitution which undermines our democracy that the UFO cover-up gatekeepers so fervently believe they are defending. Listen to the former Minister of Defense of Canada Paul Hellyer close this post with the introductory statement he presented at the historic 2013 Citizen Hearing on Disclosure:

    Please support New Paradigm Institute. Let’s get the UFO cover-up behind us!

  • NASA Director Bill Nelson: “The NASA UAP Study Team did not find any evidence that UAP have an extraterrestrial origin.”

    NASA Director Bill Nelson: “The NASA UAP Study Team did not find any evidence that UAP have an extraterrestrial origin.”

    Premise: What we are currently witnessing in the ebb and flow of UFO Disclosure is an internecine struggle between the Executive and Legislative branches of our government that concerns which of those branches will control the UFO/UAP narrative during peacetime and, eventually, which will primarily manage our evolving relationship, diplomatic or otherwise, with the non-human intelligence (NHI) responsible for decades of UFO/UAP sightings and close encounters.

    It is unwise and even dangerous to have either of these two branches of our government maintain an exclusive prerogative to manage our evolving relationship with the NHI behind the UFO/UAP.


    More than hypothetical.

    Recently, a new Disclosure Project witness named Michael Herrera has appeared on the UAP/UFO scene (begin at 1:06:16). Previously a US Marine, Mr. Herrera has spoken publicly (whistleblown) about being held at gunpoint in October 2009 while personally witnessing, along with 5 other Marines, a large, silent, disc-shaped UFO hovering off the ground as some unknown cargo was off-loaded from it, by humans, in a jungle near the city of Padang on the island of Sumatra in Indonesia.

    After listening to Mr. Herrera, my assessment is that he is telling the truth. If he’s telling the truth, this brings up raft of questions. How did these humans get their hands on an operable UFO? Was that UFO made by humans and who were the humans that were operating that craft? If it was made by humans, was it a product of a US government reverse engineering “black” program that Senior Intel officer turned whistleblower David Grusch has told us about? If it is (I’m assuming it still exists), how was the original UFO it was copied from acquired? Did the original UFO it was copied from come from a non-human intelligence (NHI), like extraterrestrials? If so, was it acquired from a “UFO crash”, or was it brought down to Earth by some kind of kinetic or directed-energy weapon through an aggressive military action that any human, and especially any government on this planet, would consider an act of war? If it was brought down through an act of war, what role, if any, did our US Department of Defense (DoD) play in this? Is our nation engaged in a hot war with some species of extraterrestrials that every US citizen knows nothing about? Were the 3 UFO shoot-downs that happened this past February and that citizens were subsequently told nothing about actually US military actions taken against an extraterrestrial adversary as part of that war? If we are at war with an extraterrestrial species, does Congress know about this? If we are at war with an extraterrestrial species, who in the US DoD and/or the Intelligence Community knows about this? Why in 2016 did General Mark Milley (begin at 00:34:10) tell the soon-to-become US military officers graduating from Norwich College that they would be serving in a complex world and would be “dealing with little green men”? I think we all know what he was implying.

    If I knew for a fact that any of this somewhat informed speculation is true, I would be blowing my whistle right now and, apparently, many are. In a recent article written by Michael Shellenberger, Andrew Mohar, and Phoebe Smith published on September 25, 2023 in Public (subscription required), these journalists inform us that approximately 30 new whistleblowers have stepped forward to reveal to the Inspectors General of the Intelligence Community (Thomas A. Monheim) and Department of Defense (Robert P. Storch) and to certain Congressional committees what they know about UFO “crash” retrieval and reverse engineering programs taking place as black Unacknowledged Special Access Programs (USAPs) that are being illegally funded by some clandestine factions within our own government.

    Below I will explain why Congress must address all of this NOW and why NASA’s new UAP Independent Study Team is (unwittingly by those involved) intended to be yet another long-term stall tactic, like Project Blue Book, employed by the DoD to shore up its now crumbling UFO cover-up.

    NASA’s September 14, 2023 briefing.

    During the September 14, 2023 briefing summarizing NASA’s UAP Independent Study Team‘s (UAPIST) recommendations addressing how NASA might contribute to the study of UAP/UFOs, NASA Director Bill Nelson made it (suspiciously) certain that the listening audience heard his words as he repeated his message twice – no evidence of extraterrestrials!

    That the NASA UAPIST deliberately excluded classified data and historical reports from law enforcement agencies, the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC), collections of historical data from, for example, NICAP, NARCAP, CUFOS, SCU, or the personal archives of previous UFO researchers like Ted Phillips, Dr. James McDonald, Stanton Friedman, or even the AIRCAT files of NASA’s own Dr. Richard Haines, I was left with the distinct impression that NASA did not want to find evidence of extraterrestrials associated with UAP/UFOs. At least not yet. If they did want to now, they would have pressed for “whole of government” access to the Department of Defense’s (DoD), the Intelligence Community’s (IC), and the Department of Energy’s (DOE) stacks and substacks of classified files on UAP/UFOs they have amassed over nearly 80 years of UAP activity on and around planet Earth. But NASA didn’t do that. In fact, NASA deliberately avoided doing that. Why?

    They didn’t do that because, NASA says, they want to be able to be completely honest and transparent in sharing everything they might discover about UAP/UFOs through their scientifically rigorous, “whole of government” (excluding, of course, all classified government UAP data) study of UAP/UFOs with the world. NASA’s 34-page report could have been summarized in a single sentence, “We have decided to trash 76 years of UFO history and begin anew.” NASA essentially threw the work of many dedicated UFO researchers who gave the best years of their lives, attempting to acquire hard-earned data to understand UFOs during a period when UFOs were much more anathema than they are today, right into the dumpster. This, despite that, at the end of the day, every single one of those researchers mentioned above, and including Dr. J. Allen Hynek, did conclude that some UAP/UFOs were, most likely, of extraterrestrial origin. How much farther down the road than that conclusion will NASA’s study of UFOs take us? Not much farther. Ever.

    Please carefully note that these promises coming from NASA are the very same promises made by those who were involved with Project Blue Book, the USAF’s “comprehensive” study on UAP/UFOs ranging from 1952 until its deflating conclusion in 1969. The world waited 17 years for that “scientific study” which also concluded with “no evidence of extraterrestrials”. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

    If we want to find Easter eggs, we don’t look for them in the beer and wine section of our grocery store.

    But maybe that’s where NASA administrator Bill Nelson shops for his Easter eggs? The reason the UAPIST did not find evidence to support UAP/UFOs having an extraterrestrial origin in any peer-reviewed scientific literature is because that data isn’t there. For decades, most reputable and published scientists have deliberately avoided having anything to do with UAP/UFOs, knowing that engaging with this subject would torpedo their careers. They certainly did not publish peer-reviewed scientific papers in reputable scientific journals touting their firm conclusion that some UAP/UFOs might have an extraterrestrial source. To do so would have been suicide so far as their careers were concerned. They sheepishly complied with the deliberately constructed social taboo created and maintained by the US legacy media at the behest of the US DoD that has surrounded UAP/UFOs for our entire lifetimes. Today, a few heroic scientists like Dr. Avi Loeb, Dr. Garry Nolan, Dr. Kevin Knuth, and Robert Powell, among a few others, have chosen to jump the fence and leave the corral. My hat is off to them. They are examples of independent thinkers demonstrating the scientific integrity we expect from true men of science.

    About NASA. Is Director Bill Nelson to blame?

    Under the supervision and direction of the President, the Administrator shall be responsible for the exercise of all powers and the discharge of all duties of the Administration and shall have authority and control over all personnel and activities thereof.

    Director of NASA Bill Nelson was nominated by and serves at the pleasure of President Biden. Although NASA is deemed to be an independent civil agency within the US government, NASA effectively falls within the Executive branch of our government. NASA has a close working relationship with several agencies within the US Department of Defense. For practical purposes, NASA can be considered to be an illegitimate stepchild of the DoD. So, now we have not one, but two official government agencies, NASA and the AARO (All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office) under the thumb of the DoD who are apparently tasked, for the time being, with convincing American citizens that no UAP/UFOs are of extraterrestrial origin.

    No evidence of extraterrestrials?

    Eyewitness testimony from credible witnesses is considered quite valuable in our courts. Maybe we should have the Judicial Branch of our government run this show? It does not take a genius to conclude that the UAP/UFO craft repeatedly observed to be obviously operating under intelligent control and reported in our skies for 7 decades by tens of thousands of sensors (human eyeballs) and by radar and FLIR imaging, that have exhibited the “5 (or 6) observables” described by AATIP Director Luis Elizondo, that have been chased and fired upon by military pilots while UAP jammed their avionics and weapons systems multiple times, that have massively but silently glided low and slow over Phoenix while witnessed by hundreds of credible people including Arizona’s ex-governor and private pilot Fife Symington, that have landed on dry lake beds and multiple schoolyards in front of hundreds of children (and in one case physically stood no more than 2 meters away from them), that have temporarily disabled our nuclear weapons multiple times at multiple locations, that have physically abducted citizens against their will thousands of times, that have left > 2000 ground landing traces documented by UFO researchers like Jacques Vallee and Ted Phillips, and that have “crashed” (or were shot down?) and been recovered, in some cases with their pilots, multiple times as testified before Congress, under solemn oath, by senior Intel Officer David Grusch and also by Major Jesse Marcel Sr., Lt. Col. Jesse Marcel, Jr., and Col. Phillip Corso, among others, are, in fact, technologically sophisticated craft that are not of present-day human origin. They are, by definition, “extraterrestrial”. The sentence above is so unmanageably long because the evidence supporting this foregone conclusion is, by now, voluminous. But NASA threw all of that in the garbage. Either NASA’s UAPIST of esteemed scientists cannot put 2 and 2 together, or they have been instructed not to. I opine the latter. They have chosen to willfully remain in the corral. If they are knowingly and willfully participating in what is intended to become the latest iteration of Project Blue Book 2.0, while also intending to delay an announcement that some UAP/UFOs are of extraterrestrial origin for another 17 years, then may they choke on their NASA paychecks.

    But we know those NASA UAPIST scientists are not stupid. They must know they are choosing to play a role in a theatrical production, a screenplay designed and intended to allow the US DoD and Intelligence Community (IC) to gracefully exit from their sordid past history of constantly gaslighting America’s citizens about UFOs, of illegally misdirecting funding previously appropriated by Congress for other specific reasons, of emotionally and physically abusing private citizens to maintain their cover-up of UFOs, of corrupting America’s mainstream media with their threats of exclusion, of covering up the importance of crop circles and cattle mutilations, of never informing American citizens about UFO/NHI nuclear weapons shut-downs and, perhaps most threatening of all, potentially engaging in acts of war against the NHI responsible for UAP/UFOs. These are all gangster behaviors. The list of misdeeds is almost as long as that of the evidence supporting UAP/UFOs being extraterrestrial in origin.

    In short, the scientists involved with NASA’s UAPIST have elected to furnish “the US government” with a (distant) future, “Eureka! Who knew? UAP are of extraterrestrial origin after all!” headline it will so desperately need to help extricate itself from the absolute mess it has created and that one would expect after so many decades of UFO cover-up. God forbid this charade takes another 17 years to play out. These malleable scientists may consider themselves to be American patriots, but I do not. Our government’s dirty (putrid) UAP/UFO laundry needs to be aired and measures taken to prevent such a fiasco from ever happening again. Congress needs to exert its muscle about this, and it needs to do that NOW! We may be at war with some species of extraterrestrials and not even know it. Canadian Minister of Defense Paul Hellyer told us this could happen, and now it is beginning to appear that he was correct.

    Is NASA playing word games?

    “Extraterrestrial” may be an imprecise descriptor of who or what the NHI behind UAP/UFOs we are dealing with is or where they come from because the American public has never been informed of this, if this is already known. Several other more precise descriptors (artificial intelligence, time machines, bionic beings, interdimensionals, extratempestrials, cryptoterrestrials, ultraterrestrials, etc.) denoting the nature of and place of origin of the NHI behind UAP/UFOs may well, by now, be known by some (a few) in NASA, the DoD, and the Intelligence Community (IC). Given NASA’s statement above, we might infer that NASA has determined that the NHI behind UAP/UFOs are not specifically “extraterrestrial”, meaning they do not stem from other planets within our solar system or beyond. Has NASA apparently informed us of this in the UAPIST’s report? Once again, we are left hanging in a state of cognitive dissonance with NASA being the latest iteration of government agencies, perhaps unknowingly, tasked with gaslighting the American public about the true nature of UAP/UFOs. And we are paying for this ongoing charade. Today we are paying mostly in US dollars. As the combined threats of global climate change, global nuclear war, and possibly a hot war with extraterrestrials continue to escalate, we may soon be paying with our lives and those of our children. The UFO cover-up must end. Potential new technologies that may prove beneficial in helping solve these looming and existential challenges may be forthcoming if we can lift the lid on the UFO cover-up. All of us can help make this happen.

    Playing word games with America’s citizens as we are forced to divine NASA’s meaning of the word “extraterrestrial” is a far cry from the “transparency” that Bill Nelson and others connected with NASA’s UAPIST promised during the press conference in which the UAPIST’s report was unveiled to the American public. Nelson’s statement, “The NASA UAP Study Team did not find any evidence that UAP have an extraterrestrial origin” may simply be yet another disingenuous statement intended to dissuade public interest in UAP, a tactic that has been employed for decades to maintain the “integrity” of the UFO cover-up. If we consider Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick’s/AARO’s almost identical message to the public, “no evidence of extraterrestrials”, we can be certain that this is the official statement all informed chorus line participants in the NASA and AARO efforts to “study” UAP/UFOs will abide by until otherwise instructed. NASA has been compromised.

    We can now be certain that NASA has become part of the UFO cover-up because, contrary to NASA and AARO’s claims, there is no doubt that some other-than-present-day-human NHI is responsible for some of the tens of thousands of UAP/UFO reports over the past 7 decades. Even if we ignore the historical evidence cited above, recently, informed individuals like David Grusch, Luis Elizondo, Christopher Mellon, Dr. Eric Davis, Col Phillip Corso, and Dr. Hal Putoff, among others, have essentially told us that some UAP/UFOs are of NHI/extraterrestrial origin, and they would know. Now we have reports of 30 more whistleblowers who have stepped forward to tell their OAP/UFO-related stories. The lid on UFO secrecy must be about to blow. You can help with that.

    Our system of checks and balances is out of balance.

    In an ideal world the responsibility of managing our nation’s relationship with the NHI behind UFOs/UAP would be transparently shared between the Executive and Legislative Branches of our government, with each performing its role in checking and balancing the other. This model presumes that both Branches of our government would be equally informed about the real existence of the NHI behind UFOs/UAP – who they are, where they come from, why they are here, how long they have been here, that they have disabled our nuclear weapons, that they have been abducting citizens against their will, and that some of their craft have been recovered and delivered to clandestine and highly classified Unacknowledged Special Access Programs (USAPs) tasked with reverse engineering the recovered UFO/UAP.

    However, we now know that such equally shared knowledge and responsibility concerning the management of UFOs/UAP has never been the case and, perhaps, never will be if the DoD has its way. If you recall, the Executive Branch of our government was first on the scene of the UFO that crashed near Roswell in 1947 and, with this new windfall technology and profound knowledge, has effectively mandated that the management of mankind’s evolving relationship with UFOs/UAP and the NHI behind them is and will remain an exclusive domain of the Executive Branch of the US government. Many US citizens are unaware of the grave implications of this situation as it presently stands. Our government was not designed to properly function without effective checks and balances. According to our Constitution it is only Congress that is authorized to declare war on behalf of the citizens of this country, yet it may be possible that our DoD is involved in a hot war with extraterrestrials that both Congress and the American people know nothing about. We need to open our eyes, and soon!

    “No reason to conclude”?

    In the last paragraph of the NASA Independent UAP Study Team’s report we read this:

    “At this point there is no reason to conclude that existing UAP reports have an extraterrestrial source. However, if we acknowledge that as one possibility, then those objects must have traveled through our solar system to get here. (Author: this is a questionable assertion. The NHI may be manipulating time rather than 3D space.) Just as the galaxy does not stop at the outskirts of the solar system, the solar system also includes Earth and its environs. Thus, there is an intellectual continuum between extrasolar techno-signatures, solar system SETI, and potential unknown alien technology operating in Earth’s atmosphere. If we recognize the plausibility of any of these, then we should recognize that all are at least plausible.”

    In reading the NASA report, NASA’s UAPIST logic appears to be that the discovery of extrasolar or even near/on-Earth “techno-signatures” of alien life will lend additional support to the extraterrestrial hypothesis as the explanation for UFOs/UAP. But NASA should acknowledge that the discovery of extrasolar or near/on Earth techno-signatures of alien life will never prove that the UFOs/UAP stem from a non-human intelligence.

    In fact, there is no scientific study that solely addresses the techno-signatures of UFOs/UAP that will conclusively prove that UFOs/UAP stem from a non-human (or other-than-present-day human) intelligence.

    The best we can hope for is NASA stating their conclusion that some UAP/UFOs may be of other than present-day human origin. However, the question of whether UFOs/UAP could be the product of a traditional foreign adversary or a natural phenomenon we do not yet understand will always remain until our nation, on behalf of all of mankind, will finally:

    1. Begin earnest attempts to peacefully communicate with the NHI behind UFOs/UAP, and;
    2. Reveal the UAP/UFO craft that have already been physically recovered and make them available for study by the wider (global) scientific community.

    Reducing the stigma.

    We can find a quantum of solace in NASA finally and officially engaging with the systematic scientific study of UFOs/UAP. In their report, the NASA UAPIST makes it clear that NASA is now taking UFOs/UAP seriously and will allocate some of its considerable expertise toward studying UFOs/UAP. The NASA UAPIST notes that, by their officially addressing UFOs/UAP, this will further reduce the (deliberately imposed) social stigma that has shackled the UFO/UAP subject for decades. And with its report’s final sentence, the NASA UAPIST is clearly admitting that some UFOs/UAP may be the techno-signatures of the technologically advanced NHI behind the UFOs/UAP. But the NASA UAPIST will never get any further than this in their assessment of UFOs/UAP in the absence of transparent and full UFO Disclosure.

    We have reached the point where Congress MUST exert its own considerable power to wrest the long-standing, exclusive control over the UFO/UAP narrative from the Executive Branch and place it transparently and equally in the hands of Congress and the American people. That is where it belongs. The Executive Branch is already fully aware and can make recommendations to Congress in light of that awareness, but weaponizing UFO/UAP energy and propulsion systems can no longer take precedence in a world that is dealing with a burgeoning population and its resultant global climate change. Nor should our world be forced to exist under the constant threat of nuclear annihilation without ever having been officially informed about the several instances when the NHI behind UFOs/UAP have shut down those nuclear weapons – and likely for very good reasons.

    Conclusion

    NASA is not to be trusted any more than the United States Air Force insofar as the study of UAP/UFOs is concerned. They have signed up for a long period of guaranteed paychecks for those involved in the UAPIST in their pursuit of understanding UAP. NASA’s theatrics will only serve to further delay what has become inevitable.

    As their conscience weighs more heavily on them, their forward progress in reverse engineering UAP/UFOs is stymied by secrecy, their lives become increasingly affected by global climate change and they conclude, as I have, that our nation may be engaged in a hot war with an extraterrestrial/NHI species that none of us have been told anything about, more UAP/UFO whistleblowers are going to step forward. Now that some credible scientists have chosen to engage, citizen -led efforts to study UAP/UFOs like Dr. Avi Loeb’s Galileo Project will find some of the evidence they are looking for to support the real existence of and non-human origin of UAP. They will tell us UAP are metallic, they move really fast, they develop tremendous G forces under acceleration and deceleration, they produce enormous amounts of energy, and they are able to make acute turns at tremendous speeds etc. They are going to acquire the scientific data to back up the long-standing claims that UAP/UFOs are real and unlikely to be of human origin. In other words, using the scientific method, they will tell us lots of things about UAP/UFOs that we already know. But then they will have the data to back up those claims.

    But what we need more than this at this moment is an aggressive Congressional intervention to put a final end to the UFO cover-up. Senator Schumer’s Amendment 836, otherwise known as The UAP Disclosure Act of 2023, will be of immense benefit in achieving this goal if Congress will only pass that amendment. Alternatively, we need a UAP/UFO landing on the White House lawn which may not be far off if our DoD is engaged in a hot war with extraterrestrials. Given what we are hearing from whistleblowers like Michael Herrera, to me it’s feeling like that moment may be closer at hand than we realize. Go to www.declassifyuap.org and tell your representatives in Congress to support The UAP Disclosure Act of 2023! Please do this now.

  • The Roswell Song by Reina el Cid and Toni Lindgren

    The Roswell Song by Reina el Cid and Toni Lindgren

    These two talented women gained some new insights over their ten-day visit to Roswell!

    Why is taking everybody else so long to grasp the truth about the Roswell UFO cover-up?

  • Are You Looking for the Truth? Well, Here It Is.

    Are You Looking for the Truth? Well, Here It Is.

    The Jesse A. Marcel Library endorses all of the information presented in this video except “Marciel”. His name was Marcel.

    In this video lecture, psychologist Dr. Jerry Kroth does a wonderful job of characterizing our currently flawed consensus reality and suggests where we need to go from here. We have a lot of catching up to do – and we may still have time!

  • What is “Free Speech”?

    What is “Free Speech”?

    Is House Intel Chairman Mike Turner’s response we hear in this interview protected as “free speech?”

    Question: What did the Founding Fathers of our Constitution have in mind when they adopted the First Amendment to our Constitution, the first among the ten amendments referred to as the Bill of Rights?

    The video below of Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo’s interview with House Intel Committee Chair Mike Turner (R-OH) gives us a very clear example of how the narrative surrounding the UFOs/UAP reality has been controlled in such ways that the average American citizen looks away and goes back to their business. Turner’s deceptive response to Bartiromo’s question that clearly references UFO/UAP whistleblower David Grusch’s testimony, which Grusch has declared to Congress under oath, will serve to discredit Grusch’s allegations in the minds of many viewers. That is Turner’s mendacious intention. Watch the interview below and listen to what Turner has to say:

    Rep. Mike Turner doing his part to maintain the UFO/UAP cover-up!

    The First Amendment

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”


    What did the Founding Fathers have in mind when they included “freedom of speech” in the first amendment? Although the Supreme Court has defined what constitutes freedom of speech in certain contexts, it has never specifically addressed whether words addressed to the American public by a government official with an intention to deceive are protected under the First Amendment. We, The People would all agree that they shouldn’t be.

    David Grusch vs. Rep. Mike Turner

    We can now be certain we are dealing with a decades-long US government cover-up of the UFO/UAP reality. Does “freedom of speech” mean that all the lies that have been spoken to enforce the “UFO Truth Embargo” have been acceptable under the First Amendment?

    TURNER: “You know, Maria, I always love it when somebody comes forward and testifies about things that they do not know anything about.”

    Turner’s response to Bartiromo’s question is a string of deceptive statements (lies) from start to finish. They are defamatory statements intended to discredit David Grusch’s testimony. Remember, Grusch has testified that he has already briefed members of the Senate and House Intel committees, handing over to them documents, photographs, and summaries of his interviews with 40 individuals who are or have been directly involved in what Grusch refers to as “The Program” to capture and reverse-engineer craft and technologies stemming from a Non-Human Intelligence (NHI). There is no way that Mike Turner is not aware of all the facts.

    If it’s not clear to you yet, it has become clear to me that Rep. Mike Turner knows about the UFO/NHI reality yet apparently remains a steadfast supporter of the UFO/UAP cover-up. In this interview he abuses his gravitas as Chair of the HOR Intel committee to discredit David Grusch and lie to the American people.

    If you are a registered voter in Ohio’s 10th Congressional district, please note that your Representative, Mike Turner, is a liar who does not deserve your vote in the next election. I intend no deception behind this statement which, therefore, should be protected as free speech under the First Amendment. If Congress does truly represent the citizens of this country, further evidence supporting this assertion should soon be forthcoming with the passage of Senator Chuck Schumer’s amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act of 2024 (S.2226) titled The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Act of 2023 (S. Amt. 797).

    Mr. Turner, you are on the wrong side of history! If they haven’t already, Ohio voters will soon realize this and remove you from the high office you are abusing.

  • S. 2226 Will Set the Record Straight

    S. 2226 Will Set the Record Straight

    If you were born on planet Earth, you may want to give the content of S. 2226 (shown below) your undivided attention. The importance of this carefully crafted amendment, put forward by Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on July 11, 2023, cannot be overstated. This amendment makes it clear that UFOs are real and there is a non-human intelligence (NHI) behind them. We do not need to “read between the lines”- it’s all written in S.2226 in black and white. Unlike the shadow of doubt cast upon many previous UFO-related government documents that have appeared throughout decades of our government gaslighting the public (and most of Congress) on the topic of UFOs and NHI, with S. 2226 there is no debate that this government document is real.

    S.2226 mandates the establishment of a committee to be entrusted with creating a comprehensive historical archive of all things related to UFOs/UAP to be safekept at the National Archives and Records Administration. The implications of this historical document are far-reaching. What it says within its 64 pages is, for practical purposes, what many of us would define as a written form of (partial) UFO Disclosure! With this document, on top of an already scheduled July 26,2023 US HOR Oversight Committee hearing on UFOs/UAP, the “UFO Twitterverse” is riding a wave of high expectation about what is soon to come. That the expectation many of us have been waiting and hoping for, that is, full and unfettered UFO Disclosure, is going to happen within the next few weeks. There are a number of reasons to temper that expectation.

    • It is July 19 and the New York Times and Washington Post continue to ignore this proposed amendment to NDAA 2024. They are clearly at the beck and call of the Department of Defense and US Intelligence Community.
    • S.2226 has been directed by Senator Schumer to “lie on the table”. However, significantly, it was also ordered to be printed and it was released to the public for a reason.
    • S. 2226 mentions nothing about alien abductions, cattle mutilations, or crop circles – three other phenomena that are almost certainly connected to the UFO/UAP phenomenon.
    • UFOs vs. nukes eyewitness Robert Salas has not been contacted to participate in the scheduled July 26, 2023 HOR Oversight Committee’s UFO hearing. This is a glaring omission that indicates Congress, and certainly the DoD do not want the public to be informed about this most important aspect of the UFO phenomenon – at least not yet.
    • In a press conference July 17, White House spokesman John Kirby was still stating, paraphrased, “UFOs are real but we don’t know what they are. We created the Pentagon’s AARO (All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office) to help us figure that out.” Kirby’s statement, “We don’t know what they are” is a lie. If the Biden administration really doesn’t know what UFOs/UAP are, then they need to start kicking in some Pentagon doors to find out. Don’t hold your breath while waiting for AARO to tell us the truth about UFOs.
    • AARO has now existed for one year and has, so far, been only another outlet for DoD/IC disinformation, propaganda, and disappointment about UFOs/UAP. On June 6, 2023, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick said, “I also state clearly for the record that in our research, we have found no credible evidence thus far of extraterrestrial activity, off-world technology, or objects that defy the known laws of physics.” Intelligence officer David Grusch begs to differ, and his insider information was deemed “credible and urgent by the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community. See below if you are unfamiliar with David Grusch’s story.

    “The Pentagon” (a faction within) has been gaslighting the public about UFOs for decades. It’s AARO office cannot be trusted to tell the truth about UFOs. Since the beginning of the UFO cover-up, the DoD has told us only what they wanted us to hear and, using the psychological tools of counterintelligence against its own citizens and our elected representatives (manipulation of the news media, stigmatization, social and physical intimidation, etc.), they crafted the “UFO Truth Embargo” over a period exceeding seven decades. This was accomplished under the guise of “national security”, always our government’s go-to justification for lying to the American public. We would expect such behaviors from an organized crime syndicate, but not from the government of the United States of America. We must find ways to do better than this in the future.

    They Know.

    There is presently a disconnect between what we are hearing from the Pentagon, the White House, and Congress about UFOs/UAP. We are witnessing a power struggle within our government centering on UFOs/UAP, what branch of our government will control the UFO/UAP narrative and, most importantly, which branch of our government will guide our evolving relationship with the non-human intelligence behind UFOs/UAP I refer to as The Others.

    Stating the obvious, if Senators Chuck Schumer, Mike Rounds, Marco Rubio, and Kirsten Gillibrand who crafted the S.2226 amendment did not know, FOR A FACT, that UFOs/UAP and the repeatedly referenced non-human intelligence behind them are real, then what we read in S.2226 would never have been codified into this proposed amendment to the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2024. Senators Rounds, Rubio, and Gillibrand are currently members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Schumer is an ex officio member of that committee. So was Senator Harry Reid, the individual who jump-started the “Controlled Disclosure Campaign Plan” defined in S.2226. They all know the truth, or most of the truth about UFOs. As our elected representatives should, with S. 2226 they are trying to tell us some, but not all, of that truth. I am grateful for that, but I am still unsatisfied. Congress must gain full control over the UFO/UAP narrative if We, the People are to have our elected representatives guide the evolution of our relationship with The Others. We do not want the Pentagon’s military mindset making those decisions for us. The Others are not hostile. If they were we would know that by now. It is time for this transition in control over the UFO/UAP narrative to happen. It is time for the Pentagon to butt-out.

    There should be no doubt that this amendment’s content and wording were carefully considered, and significant time was invested in creating it. It is not a hoax. These facts must be appreciated by all of us because (eventually) all our lives are going to be affected by what is written in S.2226. There is an extensive historicity to UAP (UFOs) that is acknowledged and prioritized in S.2226. That volume of information could conceivably require a physical addition to the National Archives building to contain all of it! If so, then so be it, because the measures called for in this amendment are that important.

    How important? UFO Disclosure is going to change the course of every human society on Earth and do so permanently. There is nothing in the foundations of our civilization that will not be affected when full and unfettered UFO Disclosure finally happens. One of those foundations is the sacrosanct status of government documents that are indiscriminately and inappropriately classified (withheld from the public) in the name of “national security”. If this Republic will continue to thrive, that fortress of “national security” is going to have to be significantly remodeled and replaced by one with walls of glass. My personal faith in the honesty and integrity of our government at the federal level is at an all-time low, but S.2226 gives us a new reason to hope that our government is turning a corner in its relationship with We, the People.

    The S.2226 Amendment

    Why Now?

    The US House of Representatives (HOR) Oversight Committee is scheduled to hold a public hearing on July 26, 2023 during which testimony from several new whistleblowers will, hopefully, bring a great deal of highly credible, first-hand information concerning captured or retrieved UAP/UFOs and the legacy (meaning long-standing) Special Access Programs (SAPs) tasked with studying and reverse-engineering those craft to the full attention of Congress. We will see. The answer to “why now?” centers on the previous testimony and allegations of David Grusch. If you do not know about Grusch, then listen to this.

    For the present, Senator Schumer has directed S.2226 to “lie on the table”. In the US Senate, this move is not necessarily intended to kill the amendment but, rather, to keep it in play but in a state of dormancy. S. 2226 makes it clear to the DoD, to the White House, and to the American people where Congress intends to go with the UFO/UAP issue. They intend to give the information to the world. It is high time that happens, and I applaud every member of Congress who will get behind this movement. In upcoming elections, I will not vote for any who don’t. If what we hear during the July 26 hearing comes from first-hand eyewitnesses who support the claims of US intel officer David Grusch, then S. 2226 promises that we will definitely see further action to approve this amendment because its laudable goal, which is absolutely necessary, is to establish and maintain a complete historical account of humanity’s realization of our First Contact with a non-human intelligence engaging the human race (credit to Steven Bassett of Paradigm Research Group for the use of that phrase). Hopefully S. 2226 does not serve as a signal for the DoD to fire up its paper shredders. To do so would be a crime against all of humanity.