Have you noticed that this conclusion, “it is, of course, a hoax”, has been immediately and habitually affixed by the mainstream media to almost every single event that might have caused people to wonder if the event could be related to extraterrestrial activity on planet Earth? There are many examples of this so easily applied yet devastating psychological strategy being routinely used by the media to delegitimize a variety of such events, without any evidence to support the event being a hoax! This has been a deliberate effort by the media to dampen (or even destroy) public interest in unusual phenomena like crop circles, vivid photographs or videos of UFOs, or the accounts of fellow citizens who have reported face-to-face interactions with non-human aliens during abduction events. This is the primary reason the UFO cover up has been so successful for so long.
In this essay I will focus on two events that have both been immediately labeled as hoaxes: the (3) Chilbolton crop circles and the recent discovery of the Nazca Mummies. In my opinion, none of these events are hoaxes.
The Chilbolton Crop Circle
Seen in Steve Alexander’s (Temporary Temples | The Latest UK Crop Circles) photograph above are two crop circles that suddenly appeared over separate nights in a field of wheat located next to the U.K.’s Chilbolton Observatory radio telescope. Both crop circles were reported in the Crop Circle Connector website on Sunday, August 19, 2001. Notably, the image of what looks to be a generic human face appeared 3 days before the rectangular crop circle appeared, as if to indicate that the message was intended for humans.
It is important to note that the specific technique used to create the image of the human face had never been employed in a previous crop circle and has not been repeated in any other crop circles since then. Today, 23 years later, nobody has ever taken credit for creating these two crop circles. At the time these crop circles were discovered, the Chilbolton Observatory had security cameras and a night watchman. Neither recorded nor reported any activity in the immediately adjacent wheat field on these separate nights, and nobody was ever arrested, much less prosecuted, for trespassing onto this farmer’s crop field and destroying a portion of his wheat crop. This, even though the rectangular crop circle was created less than 75 meters from the front door of Chilbolton observatory!
Shown on the left, above, is an aerial photograph of the “Arecibo reply” crop circle that was fortunately captured by U.K. photographer Steve Alexander. We see that this crop circle was presented as a mirror image of Frank Drake, et al.’s original Arecibo message shown in the diagram on the right. Presented to the world in this way, it conveys the idea that the original message is being reflected back to mankind by its creators.
What Was The Original Arecibo Message?
The original Arecibo message (above, right) was sent into space, like a “message in a bottle”, from the Arecibo radio telescope on November 16,1974 using a transmitting power of 450kW. The message format and content were cleverly designed with collaboration among a group of Arecibo astronomers including Frank Drake and Carl Sagan. The message, composed of both visual graphics and Base-2 binary code, was transmitted for 169 seconds using a frequency modulated signal of 2380 MHz. The binary ones and zeros were specified using 2 modulated frequencies separated by 10 KHz.
For a detailed explanation of the math, chemistry, and biological information that was encoded into the 7 informational sections of the original Arecibo message and to better appreciate its deep underlying complexity, please watch this well-done explanation presented in this video: Arecibo Message (Detailed Explanation) (youtube.com)
A Response to the Arecibo Message?
Within days after the rectangular “Arecibo reply” crop circle appeared, an astute observer realized that its layout and content were evidently a reply to the binary encoded Arecibo message that was sent into space 27 years before this crop circle appeared. This exciting discovery was met with great interest and speculation, with many enthusiasts and experts optimistic about the potential implications. The proximity of this crop circle to the Chilbolton radio telescope added another layer of fascination, providing further evidence of a possible reference to the message sent from the Arecibo radio telescope.
To re-create the Arecibo message in the wheat field required that a grid consisting of 23 columns x 73 rows comprising 1679 spaces be initially laid out. If humans created this, this work would necessitate their ability to work efficiently and almost silently in the darkness of night without being detected and without making any errors. Keep in mind, there were 1679 potential opportunities to make an error, but that didn’t happen. The perpetrators, if human, would have had to park their vehicles somewhere other than the observatory’s parking lot, while also going undetected. As a prerequisite, this work required a very detailed understanding of the logic that was used to create the original Arecibo message, as well as an understanding of binary code presented in a Base-2 format. This detailed understanding would have then allowed them to make the observed alterations to the original Arecibo message that are indicated in the diagram below.
The Changes Made to the Original Arecibo Message
The diagram below illustrates the changes made to the original Arecibo message that were reflected in the Chilbolton crop circle reply. My purpose here is not to dwell on the precise changes to the binary-encoded data presented in the Chilbolton crop circle. My purpose, rather, is to question whether this crop circle was, in fact, a hoax perpetrated by humans as has been claimed, or if it may have been a reply sent to all of mankind by a Non-Human Intelligence (NHI).
In this essay, Richard Hoaglund presents his estimate of the probability that the “Arecibo reply” crop circle was created by humans. Grounded in several reasonable assumptions concerning the circumstances surrounding this crop circle, Hoaglund estimates this probability at less that 2 in 10 billion. I concur with Hoaglund’s logic and with his conclusion.
Is There Any Group of Humans Who Could Have Done This?
In this article from The Skeptic (November 22, 2023), its author, Natt Garrat, states, “Nobody has ever come forward to claim ownership for producing the image in the wheat and, honestly, that is probably the biggest piece of evidence in favour of this being a “genuine” ET message – it truly is a work of art and would take some dedication to pull off. If I had done it, I would absolutely be showing it to everyone that would look.”
Well, all I can say to that statement is, me too! The only “qualified” group of people I can think of who could have been involved in creating these two (actually 3; see below) crop circles would be the astronomers and technicians who were working at the Chilbolton Observatory in August of 2000 to August of 2001.
If anyone who was working at the Chilbolton Observatory from August 2000 – August 2001 happens to see this essay and can testify to their certain knowledge that nobody who was employed at the Chilbolton Observatory over that time would have been involved in creating these 2 crop circles, as well as a third crop circle I will describe below, your honest input would be highly valued and much appreciated. We need to get to the bottom of this.
Keep in mind that creating these crop circles would have been an illegal trespass on this farmer’s property along with the destruction of a portion of his crop. Would scientists do something like this? Why would they do this? Did the farmer speak with anyone at the Chilbolton Observatory to ask if they had seen or recorded anyone trespassing into his crop field? If he did, would the Chilbolton astronomers have lied to him about their involvement? None of this makes any sense.
But That’s Not All!
The crop circle shown below appeared almost exactly one year earlier on August 13, 2000 in in the same crop field in almost exactly the same location as the two other crop circles described above. As with the “Arecibo reply” crop circle, the creators of this crop circle have remained anonymous for 24 years. Once again, if created by humans, they would have had to accomplish this intricate work in the dark of night in very close proximity to the Chilbolton radio telescope facility undetected by security cameras or security personnel and without errors. This crop circle appears to potentially represent the design of a radio transmitter, perhaps one radiating microwaves. It showed up again, unmistakably, 1 year later, as part of the Arecibo reply crop circle!
Crop circle researcher Zef Damon presented this geometrical reconstruction of the August 13, 2000 crop formation which serves to graphically illustrate the series of complex steps that would necessarily be involved in creating this crop circle if it had been constructed using ropes, boards, and a tape measure. Damon shows us that this construction would require more than 50 geometric operations to accurately create this crop circle!
New Revelations
Today in 2024 we can know, if we are paying attention, that a UFO Disclosure process is in motion to gradually inform the public that “we are not alone”. This planet and our civilization are experiencing contact with a non-human, extraterrestrial intelligence. Congress now knows this and is currently working to pass statutory legislation that will help get to the bottom of what has been a long-standing UFO cover up.
A series of revelations have come to us from a continuously growing list of credible individuals previously and/or presently connected to various U.S. military and intelligence agencies who have firsthand knowledge of this. Some of their names (in random order) include: Jesse Marcel, Sr., Jesse Marcel, Jr., Jonathan Weygant, Clifford Stone, Bill Uhouse, Phil Schneider, Richard French, Fife Symington, David Adair, William Tompkins, Charles Halt, John Burroughs, James Penniston, Charles Hall, Kevin Day, Nat Kobitz (via Ross Coulthart), Eric Davis, Luis Elizondo, Christopher Mellon, David Grusch, Tim Gallaudet, David Fravor, Alex Dietrich, Ryan Graves, Karl Nell, Phillip Corso, and Daniel Sheehan, among others.
By now it is unreasonably skeptical to doubt that these highly credible men and women, many of whom have honorably served in our nation’s military, have been telling the public the truth – that UFOs/UAP of non-human origin have been recovered by the U.S. military, top-secret programs to reverse-engineer these craft do exist, and “we are not alone.”
Armed with this knowledge, it is entirely reasonable to come to 3 firm conclusions.
- There has been an orchestrated cover up of the fact that “we are not alone” for almost 8 decades.
- We are sharing this planet with one or more technologically sophisticated, non-human intelligence(s) (NHI).
- To maintain this cover up for so long, any public perception of crop circles as possibly being communications sent to all of mankind by this non-human intelligence (NHI) also had to be discredited or, if possible, destroyed. “It is, of course, a hoax” became the byline of most news articles and video documentaries created that addressed the crop circles.
- With these new disclosures concerning UFOs and the NHI behind them, today it is much more reasonable to question whether some crop circles have, in fact, been communications from a non-human source than it was when the Chilbolton crop circle first appeared in 2001.
In the same month (August) over 2 consecutive years at the same location next to a functional radio transmitter the world was shown a sequence of very complex images impressed into wheat that tell us an interesting story about the NHI in contact with our civilization. In 2000 they showed us their “transmitter” sending a transmission. In 2001 they showed us who the message was intended for and, 3 days later, they told us about themselves. They told us they use the base 10 number system, silicon plays an important role in their physiology, they are DNA-based creatures, their total population exceeds ours, their civilization inhabits the 3rd, 4th, and 5th planets in their solar system, and their “transmitter” is a larger and more complex design than the Arecibo radio telescope. Perhaps most importantly, they graphically showed us that their average height and physical appearance is identical to that of a classic “grey alien” that has so often been described during human abduction encounters with them.
Moving On – The Nazca Mummies
See Alien Project: the affair of the Nasca mummies, Peru (the-alien-project.com) for more information about this new discovery.
IMPORTANT UPDATE!: June 5, 2024. Please review this article that summarizes new scientific studies carried out on the Nazca Mummy “Maria”:
The discovery of the tridactyl (3 fingers, 3 toes) Nazca Mummies (NMs) occurred near the Ica/Palpa region of Peru in 2016. So far, 10 of the NMs have been studied by a group of highly qualified Peruvian and Mexican scientists and physicians. These researchers have concluded that the NMs are real, but you would not know this if all you have been exposed to as far as news about the NMs has been the mainstream media. Not only did the Peruvian Ministry of culture, without any supporting evidence, declare that the NMs are a hoax, but the mainstream media has repeatedly parroted this falsehood as well. Fortunately, according to Peruvian journalist Jois Mantilla, those scientists advocating for the authenticity of the NMs have sued the Peruvian Ministry of Culture over this and were recently awarded a $300 million judgement levied against the Peruvian Ministry of Culture.
I have reviewed several of the CT scans of the NMs “Maria”, “Josephina”, and “Montserrat” with a medical colleague who is an American Board of Radiology-certified M.D. radiologist. He stated he could see no evidence that the skeletal features of these desiccated corpses have been tampered with in any way. Having gained considerable experience in interpreting CT scans over the course of my 35 years working as a U.S. physician, I had previously and independently come to the same conclusion. I accept the NMs as real. They offer conclusive physical evidence that Earth has been visited by NHI extraterrestrials at least 1750 years in the past. As Col. Karl Nell recently stated, there is now “zero doubt” about this.
The NM “Maria’, shown above, is the most hominin (human) appearing among the 3 species of NMs discovered so far. DNA testing has shown that she shared approximately one-third of her genome with our human genome. She has been carbon dated, proving that she was a living being on this Earth around 1750 years ago.
That no other beings resembling the NMs have ever been discovered in Earth’s fossil record is extremely significant and suggests one of two possibilities; either these 3 newly discovered species are different races of NHI extraterrestrials who came to Earth from some other planet themselves, or they are a product of genetic engineering accomplished by a separate NHI/race of extraterrestrials who came to Earth at least 1750 years ago. As I see it, these are the only 2 possible explanations for the existence of the NMs. I suggest it is the latter of these two possibilities that merits our immediate attention. I suggest that he NMs were genetically engineered beings. Why must this be so?
NHI Monkey Business
The genetic divergence between humans and chimpanzees began to take place about 7 million years ago. However, the respective DNA sequences of human beings and chimpanzees still remain 96% identical. NM “Maria” shares 30% of her DNA sequences with humans. Therefore, it follows that “Maria” must also share almost 30% of her DNA sequences with chimpanzees, yet nowhere has a being like“Maria” ever shown up in Earth’s fossil record. 1750 years ago “Maria” simply appeared on Earth out of nowhere while carrying 30% of her genome that is identical to that of humans and, by default, to that of chimpanzees. Unless “Maria” evolved on a planet that also evolved chimpanzees, she must have been genetically engineered here on Earth by non-human extraterrestrials. What are the implications of that?
This obviously requires a great deal more scientific study, but if “Maria” was a genetically engineered being (which now appears to be a certainty), this begs the question of what others of Earth’s species might also have been genetically engineered by visiting ET races many thousands (or even millions) of years prior to the present day? What if the NHI with us today has not only been a space faring civilization for millions of years, but they are also experts in genetic engineering?
Consider that, when they were discovered, the NMs were found carefully packed in diatomaceous earth intended to completely desiccate and thereby preserve them intact for many centuries. We should question whether this was a deliberate effort by the NHI to intentionally leave behind this evidence to eventually be discovered and thereby inform future humans (us) of their activities involving genetic engineering on this planet. Might those activities have also involved the “creation” of any other species besides the NMs that we should seriously consider? What if the non-human intelligence (NHI) behind the UFOs arrived to Earth hundreds of thousands of years ago and also became the “creators” of our species, Homo sapiens sapiens?
The NHI Behind Today’s UFOs Has Been Abducting People For Decades
Let’s consider the “abductee’s” / “contactee’s” / “experiencer’s” accounts of being removed from their bedrooms, cars, etc., and, at times, being unwillingly forced to undergo procedures to harvest their sexual gametes, eggs and/or sperm. If the NHI behind UFOs did “create” our species homo sapiens sapiens through genetic engineering and is still working to fine tune the human genome vis-a-vis these abductions, this implies that, even today, they do not regard their self-assigned task as being fully completed. However, even today, they do not ask our permission because, from the beginning of their “Project Human” several hundred thousand years ago, they have never perceived a need to ask for permission. They were, and still are, simply doing what they came here to do. Earth, and our species, might be their civilization’s long-term project. In a very real sense, we may have been and still are their experimental subjects, or at least we have been up until now. It is time for this relationship to evolve to a new level. Perhaps they are even anxious for that to happen as well.
If they are our “creators”, this does not mean that they created us ex nihilo (“out of nothing”) but, rather, that they genetically modified a naturally evolved and already existing primate species on Earth, one created by “God”. Journalist and UFO researcher Linda Moulton Howe has stated many times that she was shown a top secret document at Kirtland AFB in the 1980s that explicitly stated this relationship as a fact.
What if, over hundreds of thousands of years, the ETs also “created” (genetically engineered) some of the billions of other species that we share this planet with, and perhaps even terraformed Earth to make it more hospitable for the species they “created”? Afterall, we are told by the likes of Zecharia Sitchin, Erich Von Daniken, and supposedly other paleographers who have allegedly translated the cuneiform writings of the ancient Sumerian tablets, that we were created by the Anunnaki, a technologically advanced civilization of space faring NHI hailing from the heavens. The Blackfeet Nation here in Montana has a similar creation story of mankind, espousing that our species was created by beings who came from the Pleiades. In the Sumerian version, this NHI is alleged to have come from a planet named Nibiru. Is this fiction, or is this truth? I cannot interpret cuneiform writing; therefore, I do not know for certain if this is true. But maybe that doesn’t really matter. Maybe, if we consider the evidence of the NMs and we simply assume this may be true, we can move forward with a plan to establish a diplomatic relationship with the NHI who are rapidly coming into sharper focus in our reality.
The “Gods” May Be Real?
Within the dogma of the Abrahamic religions, “God”, traditionally referred to as “Elohim”, is the creator of the Universe as well as our creator. They are one and the same. But what if the more proximate “creators” of us and the Source of the Universe are separate and distinct agencies? If the NHI behind UFOs did genetically engineer the NMs and our species by modifying the DNA sequences of a “lower”, Earth-evolved primate 300,000 years ago then, in the traditional Abrahamic belief systems, that would make them “Gods” to us. Afterall, in Genesis 1 in the Old Testament, we read, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness…”.
Biblical scholars Mauro Biglino and Paul Wallis have recently pointed out that, in their study of the hermeneutics underlying the Hebrew word “Elohim”, the true meaning of the word is also plural and means “the powerful ones”. Admitting the NHI may have played this vital role in our past completely changes our perspective on “God”, who would now be the Creator of the Universe, but not literally our creator – at least not directly. The Abrahamic religions may have, understandably, always misperceived this important nuance in the historical record of who created our species all along. The real existence of the NMs and the abduction phenomenon suggests this is not just a possibility but, rather, that this is probably what has happened. I propose that we should begin making decisions and acting as if this is the case.
Why Are They Here?
By now there can be no doubt that NHI behind UFOs has a keen interest in Earth and in our species. If they “created” us, then this is likely the reason for their persistent interest in Earth and our species. It may also be the reason they have been disabling our nuclear weapons, the only thing I know of that, absent their direct intervention, could put an abrupt end to their “Project Earth” and “Project Human” in a matter of a few minutes while destroying many thousands of years of their goal-directed efforts on Earth.
We will be fortunate if our species ever gains the knowledge and expertise that will enable us to engage in such a wonderfully grandiose and fruitful project as their Project Earth. If our civilization does not self-destruct, I think one day we might. Afterall, once a highly intelligent and technologically advanced species has everything figured out, what do they do to occupy their minds, enliven their spirits, and find a reason to go on living? Do they make more TV series? Do they continue to immerse themselves in football? Do they get bored with watching re-runs of I Love Lucy? What happens when their planetary population exceeds an unsustainable number? As we are already planning to do one day, they would, when they could, move out into their own solar system, then into their galaxy, and then beyond that out into the wider Universe. The Chilbolton crop circle and their presence here on Earth tell us, unequivocally, that they have already done that. It’s we humans who are the latest to attend this party. Well, us and the NMs.
The question we have been asking is, “Why do they look like us?” The question we should be asking is, “Why do we look like them?”
Our species’ shortfall in seriously entertaining these novel ideas as being real possibilities is constrained by our limited ability to conceive of time on a cosmic scale, our religious dogmas, and our curious inability to admit there may be species throughout this Universe who are much older, more experienced, and much more technologically advanced than we are. A few hundred thousand years, or even a few million years seems like a long time to us but, on the time scale of the cosmos, these expanses of time are next to nothing.
With our current but more limited expertise in genetic engineering, we are already engaged in similar work toward genetically modifying a wide variety of naturally evolved plants and animals. If the NHI has approached their project with a mindset like, say, the Japanese gardener, then beauty, form, and balance would be paramount to their goals. They will be seeking perfection. With their “Project Earth”, I think that is the case.
Now, many will rightfully argue that, regarding our species, the NHI has fallen far short of this goal as exemplified in the way humans not only treat this planet, but also in how we treat each other. My rejoinder to that legitimate point is that our species is near perfect in many ways. Our problems are not grounded in how we think, they are grounded in what we think. What we think, that is, what we have accepted as the foundational facts that underpin our civilization, have their roots in what is likely a severely flawed understanding of who we are, why we are here, and who put us here.
When we have addressed these questions in the past, we have answered them with firm conclusions that have been mired in the dogmas of our religions. If our religious dogmas have been wrong all along, then our conclusions have been corrupted by false information that, as I write this, has resulted in an unending stream of armed conflicts between or among religious factions equipped with increasingly destructive weapons. At their root, these conflicts may stem from a gross misunderstanding of these very basic questions: who we are, why we are here, and who put us here.
Presently, mankind’s knowledge and understanding of a great many things is increasing exponentially. Today, we understand what technology is and the seeming miracles it can perform. We can now envision the real possibility that we, ourselves, will one day be leaving Earth to colonize other hospitable planets. We are on the precipice of coming to understand all of this and answering these foundational questions with facts rather than false suppositions.
With that breakthrough in our understanding could, and I believe should, come a change in our relationship with our “creators”. At the very least we should be demanding our civil right to not be pulled from our beds, scared out of our wits, and be milked like farm animals. At this point we are well within our rights to negotiate and redefine our relationship with those who may well be our NHI “creators”. When we do begin to do this in earnest and as a collective, will they engage with us, listen to our objections, and respond in a positive manner? Can we establish a new set of ground rules for this relationship? That should become our present goal.
We do not need to wait for our governments to tell us the truth about UFOs and the NHI behind them. We already know much of what we need to know, that is, the NHI exists, they are here, it is likely that they genetically engineered the NMs, and they may have “created” us. We need to begin communicating with them in a way that is not subjective (unlike “CE-5”) and that all of us, or most of us, can understand and accept. How might we do this?
Does the Chilbolton Crop Circle Prove That We Can Communicate With the NHI?
I dislike the phrase “I believe”, but here I must use it. I believe that some crop circles, like some UFOs, stem from the NHI who are here and interacting with us. I believe the Chilbolton crop circle is one of a small subset of uniquely detailed crop circles sent to us as messages from the NHI. Why use a crop circle to communicate? Could it be that the NHI is aware of the decades-long cover up of UFOs and anything else associated with them? But crop circles are almost impossible to cover up. To “cover them up”, the only alternative for the UFO secret keepers has been to discredit them, and they have done that quite effectively. However, if the Arecibo radio telescope successfully transmitted a message that the NHI did receive one time, perhaps another message sent from a radio telescope could work for this purpose once again. What message should we send? What message would you send?
Calling Dr. Avi Loeb
Has Dr. Avi Loeb’s Galileo Project entertained the idea of renting time on an already existing radio telescope to transmit a diplomatic message to the NHI behind the UFOs present in our skies? If not, in my opinion, the Galileo Project is missing out on a modality that has already proven to be an effective tool for communicating with the NHI presently in contact with our civilization. It appears that they responded to us at Chilbolton via an elegant crop circle! I say send the message from the Chilbolton radio telescope. If it is not equipped for that purpose, modify it so that it is. Afterall, in 2000 and 2001 the Chilbolton site appeared to be “communications central” for the NHI. This would be a simple, inexpensive, and direct means of requesting that the NHI communicate with us at this very same site again. If we attempt this strategy, what do we have to lose?
Watch (And Photograph) the Crop Fields of the U.K.!
If such an attempt is made to communicate with the NHI by sending out a cleverly constructed message via the existing Chilbolton radio telescope, then we must be sure to monitor that crop field in the U.K. throughout the following summer to see if a specific response might once again come to us in the form of a crop circle. To that end, I recommend that the reader financially support the work of aerial photographer Steve Alexander at www.temporarytemples.co.uk. For almost 20 years Steve has faithfully and diligently photographed the crop circles from the air that have appeared in the U.K. each summer. Your money will be well spent and is desperately needed for Steve to continue this vital work. Both Steve and his wife Karen have long understood that crop circles, at least a few of them, are integral to our evolving relationship with the NHI engaging humanity. The aerial flights Steve makes throughout each summer to photograph the crop circles are expensive and Steve and Karen need our support! Let’s send a message to ET from the Chilbolton radio telescope and see what happens!
Thanks for reading!